EUGENE, Ore. -- A retrial in Louisiana is leading the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on whether or not Oregon's non-unanimous jury verdicts are constitutional.
Prior to January, Louisiana and Oregon were the only states to allow a split jury verdict in felony trials, with the exception of murder.
Last year Louisiana changed their constitution and removed split jury verdicts, leaving Oregon as the only state in America to allow it.
In October a convicted Lousiana man will be retried, due to the fact that he was previously convicted by a split jury.
The Supreme Court will make a ruling regarding that trial, which will then have an effect on Oregon's constitution regarding split jury verdicts.
- Supreme Court ruling on split jury verdicts may impact Oregon
- Momentum builds in Oregon to require unanimous jury verdicts
- US Supreme Court ruling on union dues impacts case in Oregon
- Oregon appeals court upholds $409 million verdict against BP
- Oregon Supreme Court expedites gun-control dispute
- Wanted: New Oregon Supreme Court justice
- Portland jury issues $20 million verdict against landlord
- Oregon Supreme Court to get new chief justice
- Oregon Supreme Court OKs language in gun control proposal
- Walters sworn in as chief justice of Oregon Supreme Court